In an age when allyship can come with a press release, a campaign and a carefully designed rainbow logo, one newly resurfaced story about Dolly Parton feels striking precisely because it appears to have happened so quietly.
A report published on 7th September says the late country music legend helped pay for gender-affirming care for Jason Pirro, a transgender man who worked with Parton for more than three decades as a chauffeur, assistant and trusted friend.
The specific financial claim comes from an account attributed to editor Elissa Altman and has not been independently documented through financial records released by Parton or Pirro.
So it should be described carefully: Parton reportedly helped pay for his care.
The rest of their relationship, however, is considerably better documented.
And that story may be even more meaningful.
Who was Jason Pirro?
Pirro met Parton in the 1980s and went on to work with her for more than 30 years.
Following Parton’s death in August, queer publication Them revisited archived transgender newsletters and other records documenting Pirro’s long relationship with the singer.
In 1990, Pirro’s transgender identity became the subject of tabloid coverage.
The way trans people were treated by mainstream media at the time was often invasive, sensationalist and openly dehumanising. Being publicly identified as transgender could have serious consequences for somebody’s employment and personal life.
Parton knew Pirro was trans.
She did not appear to treat that as a reason to remove him from her life.
Instead, he continued working with her for decades.
Dolly Parton kept him in her world
Pirro’s connection to Parton was not a brief professional encounter that disappeared when unwanted publicity arrived.
Them documents his continued presence across different parts of Parton’s professional world, including acknowledgements in her work over the years.
That continuity matters.
Today, public support for LGBTQ+ people is often measured through statements.
Did somebody post for Pride? Did they condemn the latest discriminatory law? Did they use the correct language?
Those things can matter.
But there is another form of allyship that is much less photogenic: what somebody does when supporting another person could actually become inconvenient.
Pirro was publicly outed at a very different moment in American culture.
Parton apparently responded by continuing to treat him as the person she already knew.
Allyship before it became branding
Parton would eventually become widely loved by LGBTQ+ audiences and was known publicly for a broad philosophy of acceptance.
Her relationship with Pirro provides a much more intimate example of what that philosophy could look like in practice.
If the newly reported account that she contributed towards his gender-affirming care is accurate, it adds another extraordinary detail.
But it is worth resisting the temptation to turn that detail into the whole story.
Trans people do not need cisgender allies to rescue them.
Good allyship is not charity bestowed on somebody because they are different.
Often it is much simpler.
Respect their identity.
Do not abandon them when other people become hostile.
Do not treat their private life as gossip.
Keep seeing the person you knew before the rest of the world suddenly decided their gender was everybody’s business.
Maybe this is what allyship actually looks like
Dolly Parton spent much of her life surrounded by enormous costumes, rhinestones, stadium lights and an image built to be larger than life.
There is something rather fitting about one of the most moving stories to emerge about her LGBTQ+ legacy being comparatively small and private.
A friend needed support.
She appears to have given it.
And then they continued being friends.
No rainbow corporate campaign. No viral social post. No demand for applause.
Just a relationship that lasted more than 30 years.
Perhaps that is why the story feels so powerful now.
Sometimes the best evidence that somebody considered trans people simply part of humanity is that they did not behave as though accepting one required a performance.
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Skip to content
