Skip to content
Six London councils have confronted Britain’s equality watchdog over rules affecting transgender people’s access to public spaces, calling the guidance “practically unworkable and morally unacceptable”.
Six London councils have stepped up their opposition to the UK’s controversial EHRC transgender guidance, warning that its implementation is already causing problems for transgender residents, council staff and public services.
Representatives from Hackney, Lambeth, Lewisham, Haringey, Southwark and Waltham Forest met with Dr Mary-Ann Stephenson, chair of the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), to demand answers about the impact of the updated rules.
Their concerns were made public in an official statement from Hackney Council on 26 October.
And the councils are not holding back.
Why Are Six London Councils Challenging the EHRC?
The controversy centres on the EHRC’s updated Code of Practice for services and public functions, which came into force on 5 August 2026.
The Code follows the UK Supreme Court’s April 2025 ruling that the terms “sex”, “woman” and “man” in the Equality Act 2010 refer to biological sex.
The updated guidance explains how organisations should apply existing equality law, including provisions concerning single-sex services.
However, the six councils argue that its practical application could lead to transgender people being excluded from facilities and public services.
They have also raised concerns about additional costs, confusion among service providers and the possibility of discrimination affecting people whose appearance does not conform to traditional gender expectations.
What Are the London Councils Actually Saying?
The councils describe the impact of the Code as both practically unworkable and morally unacceptable.
According to their joint statement, some residents and staff are already experiencing difficulties.
The representatives have raised several questions with the EHRC, including whether implementation costs were underestimated and how the watchdog intends to tackle misinformation about the rules.
They also challenged the evidence behind claims about public preferences for trans-exclusive spaces.
Hackney Mayor Zoë Garbett and the other council representatives say their priority is ensuring that transgender people can continue accessing public life safely.
This is not simply an argument about legislation.
It concerns everyday experiences, including using toilets, changing facilities and other public services without fear of confrontation or exclusion.
Does This Mean the Councils Have Overturned the Rules?
No. And that distinction is important.
The six councils have not overturned the Supreme Court ruling or suspended the EHRC Code.
Their action is a coordinated political and administrative challenge, aimed at obtaining clarification and highlighting the consequences they believe the guidance is creating.
The EHRC maintains that its updated Code does not create new laws or legal obligations. Instead, it explains how organisations should apply existing legislation.
Transgender people also remain protected against discrimination under the Equality Act, including through its gender reassignment provisions.
As The Gayly Mirror explained in our guide to what actually changed after the Supreme Court ruling, the legal position is more complicated than headlines suggesting transgender people have lost all their rights.
The controversy now concerns how those existing protections operate in practice.
Growing Opposition to the EHRC Guidance
The intervention follows earlier criticism from politicians, campaigners and public-service providers.
In September, The Gayly Mirror reported that the Liberal Democrats had rejected the EHRC’s approach as discriminatory and unworkable.
The six London councils are now bringing that debate directly into the administration of local services.
That matters because councils are responsible for facilities and services used by millions of residents.
Their concerns are therefore not limited to political disagreement.
They are also questions about whether the guidance can be applied consistently, proportionately and without leaving vulnerable people excluded.
What Happens Next?
The council representatives have sent a follow-up letter to the EHRC seeking clarification on several outstanding issues.
They want the watchdog to address the potential harm they identify and explain how organisations can comply with equality duties while protecting transgender residents.
No agreement or change to the guidance has yet been announced following their meeting.
However, the intervention increases pressure on the regulator and government to examine the practical consequences of the Code.
Equality Must Work in Real Life
Laws and official guidance are often discussed in technical language, but their consequences are experienced by real people.
For transgender residents, the debate can determine whether accessing an ordinary public facility becomes a stressful or humiliating experience.
The six London councils have made their concerns clear. The EHRC has explained the legal purpose of its guidance.
The challenge now is ensuring that equality protections work for everyone affected.
Because rights that exist on paper mean very little if people cannot exercise them safely in everyday life.
