Skip to content
Andrew Scott has spoken about the pressure gay actors once faced to hide their sexuality in exchange for career opportunities. The Irish star believes things are improving, but he hasn’t forgotten the silence that shaped an earlier generation. And darling, being gay shouldn’t be the most interesting thing about an actor. Being forced to hide it certainly should be news.
Andrew Scott has never needed his sexuality to make him interesting.
Between Sherlock, Fleabag, Ripley and All of Us Strangers, the Irish actor has established himself as one of the most compelling performers of his generation.
And yes, an entire corner of the internet still hasn’t quite recovered from the Hot Priest.
But in a new Vogue interview, published on 10 November and attracting fresh attention this week, Scott has reflected on how different his career might have been in an earlier era.
The Silent Choice Gay Actors Used to Face
Scott discussed what he describes as the pressure placed on gay actors to conceal their personal lives in order to access professional opportunities.
Straight performers could openly discuss relationships and enjoy the benefits of being considered conventional romantic leads.
Gay actors, meanwhile, were frequently expected to make a very different choice: remain silent about their sexuality or risk losing work.
Scott believes the industry is beginning to change, but he remains conscious of the discrimination experienced by earlier generations.
When asked about his own sexuality, he suggested that being gay isn’t especially interesting in itself.
And he’s got a point.
An actor’s sexuality should not automatically determine the roles they can play, the stories they can tell or the commercial opportunities available to them.
Elsinore and the Legacy of Ian Charleson
Scott’s remarks come ahead of his new film, Elsinore, which opens in cinemas on 20 November.
Directed by Simon Stone, the film tells the story of Scottish actor Ian Charleson, who performed Hamlet at London’s National Theatre in 1989 while seriously ill with AIDS.
Charleson died in 1990, aged just 40.
Scott has discussed the responsibility of portraying someone whose final months were defined not only by illness but also by extraordinary artistic courage.
The film examines an era when HIV-related stigma and the expectation of silence affected the careers and private lives of many gay men.
As The Gayly Mirror recently explored in our article about Kerr Smith and Dawson’s Creek, Hollywood and television have a long history of treating queer visibility as something controversial.
That history didn’t disappear overnight.
Here you can find the trailer of the movie
Being Gay Shouldn’t Be a Career Risk
There is something refreshing about Scott’s refusal to treat his sexuality as the defining feature of his identity.
He is an actor, a creative artist and a person with a private life.
He also happens to be gay.
That shouldn’t require an explanation, a confession or a publicity strategy.
But the freedom to say so openly has not always existed for performers who came before him.
And perhaps that is the real message behind his comments.
The goal of LGBTQ+ visibility is not to make every queer person’s sexuality the centre of attention. It is to create a world where nobody has to hide it to feel safe or successful.
Andrew Scott doesn’t need his sexuality to make him fascinating. His talent already does that. But his freedom to be himself is something earlier generations of gay actors fought hard to make possible.
